Co-Circular Activities

Co-Circular Activities

The academic curriculum is really much more important and must continue to be given more status in schools and colleges than the co-curriculum. Students are meant to be receiving an education and gaining recognised qualifications. Higher Education institutions place a greater importance on the curriculum than the co-curriculum when selecting students, and so do employers. Co-curricular activities are nice, but they have never been shown to actually play a vital role in a student’s life. And if they distract students from focusing on their academic qualifications, then they could be actually harmful.

write me an argumentative essay

There is no obvious logic in having super talented individuals, instead society should lean itself towards making specialised individuals in their selected fields. Most modern careers require expert knowledge and skills, which can take years to acquire. We should not distract a student from developing skills in whatever selected field he or she has chosen to specialise in. After all, when you see a doctor or employ an engineer, you are not interested in how “well-rounded” they are, just in whether they are good at their job.

And the Prime Minister does not play soccer or tango in the House of the Commons, therefore they do not require such skills as part of their formal education. Most specialist professions still provide a range of career opportunities, without any need to compromise academic education by over-emphasis on non-academic activities. For example, athletes who have been injured in mishaps can continue their career in the same field but just in a different post. No longer could they play, but they could still coach or even give sports science lectures to aspiring super stars.

And if someone does wish to radically switch career in mid-life, there are plenty of evening classes and continuing education opportunities to allow them to retrain. Choice works two ways. If co-curricular activities are so good, then students should have right to choose whether they wish to pursue them, rather than forcing them to give equal importance to something they do not wish to do. Through equalising the demands of academic and co-curriculums there exists the possibility that a student may drop out because he or she may not be able to cope with the demands of both sets of activities.

The right to an education is best exercised by giving students the choice to decide what field their lives would like to be based on, and about how to pursue these aims. Making extra-curricular activity compulsory will take the fun out of it and strip it of its benefits. Successful extra-curricular groups work precisely because the students have voluntarily chosen to be there. If some were forced to take part, they would be less enthusiastic and spoil the activity for the rest. And the more the activity is like ordinary school, the less attractive it will be to young people.

Most of the personal development benefits associated with extra-curricular commitments – such as altruistic service, initiative-taking, and leadership skills – come from the voluntary nature of the activity. If that voluntary aspect is removed, then the benefits are lost too. Giving a greater place in education to the co-curriculum means that many more clubs and activities will have to be organised for students. This will be very expensive as it will require more staff and more resources to be paid for. This explains why most schools that currently offer a large co-curriculum are well-funded fee-paying institutions.

Most ordinary schools, dependent on state-funding, will never be able to match this spending and could not aim to offer an ambitious co-curriculum. If they try, it will be at the expense of more important academic activities. Giving co-curricular activities greater importance in education can be harmful to civil society as a whole. There are many clubs, teams and groups available for young people already in most areas – e. g. Scouts, religious work, music, drama, sport, voluntary work in the community, etc. Why should these be ignored and only those done in school given academic credit of some kind?

Often pursuits offered by schools end up replicating those already available in the wider community. For example, a school hockey team may deprive the local town’s hockey club of young players, while school adventure activities might weaken the community’s Scouting and Guiding groups. So a strong co-curriculum may have the effect of killing off lots of worthwhile community-based activities because they do not receive school credit. This would be a shame as a strong civil society is vital to a thriving democratic culture, but also because groups that involve people of all ages possess great social and educational value. ere are my point!! : a)u got so stressed out – too little time to do ur fav thing bcoz u hav to attend co-curricular activities.. attending co-curricular activities also can make u stress out- example is u got scold juz bcoz u do a small mistake b)no time to spend with ur beloved family- can be worse if the student the only person that can search for money to support the family bcoz the family has no father- he got no time to go do extra work bcoz attending co-curricular activities c)co-curricular not so important in ur succes- when u old ur mind can still think and calculate but ur foot cant kick the ball anymore(think of it) )over scheduled over scheduled over scheduled- no time for homework or study e)student are more likely to get hurt in co-curricular activities- imagine a hockey ball flying straight to ur face In today’s highly compettitive world, we have to bear a lot of mental stress and also have to get involved in so many things in order to acquire knowledge. This is where co-curricular activities play a very significant role. They help us get mental rest and also helps us stay physically fit and healthy. Being only brilliant in academics doesn’t help a student become a responsible citizen of that country.

A student should also be equally talented in other fields and even if not, they should atleast pay some interest in them. It’s because being both academically and co-curricularly talented helps a student to face the world. This also helps in developing his/her personality. There is no doubt that academices are the priority in a student’s life but it would be very wrong to say that co-curricular activities are a kind of hindrance to academic excellence. Students don’t go to school only to study but they also go their to show their potentiality in other fields like sports, dance and music.

Moreover, i think it fully depends on the student how he manages both his study and other activities’ schedule. Another advantage of co curricular activities is that they help a student in building up their skills or nourishing their inner capabilities. Being a good debator means that a person can face any kind of interview in any interview which he applies for as naturally, he/she will have good speaking skills. Moreover, to get admitted in many top institutions in today’s world, we have atleast got to know any of the acivities other than academic like sports or music.